Skip to main content

What is the debate of Financial Bill and Money Bill for GST?




Indian parliament is all set for the most important session of the present Government starting from 16.11.2016. It is expected that the discussions will largely be confined to GST Bill, Black Money and demonetization.

Since Modi Government has majority in Lower House of Parliament i.e. Lok Sabha, it will try to present the GST Bill in form of money bill rather than financial bill. Why opposition wants the bill to be presented as financial bill, let us discuss that ahead.

Money bill is one which amends the taxation powers/revenue structure of centre/state government. As per the provisions of the Constitution of India, if a money bill is passed by lok sabha it has to be transferred to Rajya sabha. Rajya sabha may either accept the bill as such or propose the amendment and send it back to Lok Sabha. It is up to lok sabha to decide whether bring the proposed amendments or not. There is no binding on lok sabha and it can pass the bill without making those amendments. If in case Rajya sabha does not return the bill within 14 days, the bill is deemed to be passed. As such in case of Money Bill, Rajya Sabha’s power is defunct.

Financial bill is one where the bill contains both money bill provisions and other issues to be discussed in parliament. In case of financial bill, it has to be passed by majority present in both houses i.e. Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha. In such cases Rajya Sabha plays an equal role as Lok Sabha does. In this circumstances the ruling party would be reluctant to present a bill as financial bill  if they lack majority in Rajya Sabha.

Looking at the difference of money bill and financial bill, the BJP Government which has special majority in Lok sabha would like to bring GST Bill as Money Bill so that it does not get stuck in the upper house of Parliament. As the ruling party lacks majority in Rajya Sabha, opposition will make all the efforts in order to ensure that GST Bill is presented as Financial Bill so that the target of the government to roll out GST from 01.04.2017 can be postponed, Even if the opposition is able to defer the enforcement of biggest indirect tax reform, it will not be able to take it beyond September 2017. Hence we should not worry about these issues and rather prepare ourselves for the new tax regime.     

by:
 Keshav R Garg
(B.Com, CA, CS, ISA(ICAI))
Faculty for GST: Indirect Tax Committee of ICAI
Author: Bharat's GST Ready Reckoner
            A Handbook on GST
Adviser for GST: Industries Association of Chandigarh 
Member: Indirect Tax Committee of CII, PHDCCI, MyGst.MyTax Foundation
Address: 3328, Sector 27 D, Chandigarh, India - 160 019
Phones: +91-172-461-3328, +91-98880-90008
Mails: mygst.mytax@gmail.com, keshavgarg@kdai.in

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Renting of Warehouse for Agriculture Produce – Taxable under GST

In the case of Rishi Shipping – Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling has cleared the air that Storing/warehousing and renting of immovable property are two different type of services. Merely because the agricultural produce is stored in an immovable property it would not classify it as Storage and Warehousing Services. Therefore the same shall not be covered under S. No. 54 of Negative List (Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017), hence taxable under the purview of CGST and IGST Act. The Authority held that in order to classify a service as Storage and Warehousing, it should be coupled with loading/unloading/packing services etc. The authority was of the view that where mere building is let out, it shall be classified as renting of immovable property which is chargeable to tax. It is the composite supply, principal supply being renting of immovable property for storage of agricultural produce which is exempt from tax. It further held that once the...
19 comments
Read more

GST Registration in case of Renting of Immovable properties:

GST Registration in case of Renting of Immovable properties: By CA. Keshav R Garg 1.      Let us first understand that the place of registration is decided by the term place of business as defined by section 2(85) of the CGST Act 2017. As per the definition of “Place of Business” it is a place from where the business is carried on and/or where a warehouse or any other place for storage of goods is located and/or books of accounts are maintained and/or the business through agent is carried on. It nowhere considers “place of supply” for determining the Place of business for the purpose of GST Registration. Hence, place of supply has no impact as far as GST Registration is concerned. 2.      As per section 22 of the CGST Act 2017, a person is liable to take registration from the place he makes a taxable supply. There is a distinction in place of supply and place from one makes taxable supplies. Place of supply is derived to conclud...
59 comments
Read more

Tri-city Restaurants leaving Hole in your pocket by charging higher GST

Tri-city Restaurants leaving Hole in your pocket by charging higher GST By: Keshav R Garg Since the day GST has been enforced in India, most of the business had remained in dilemma about the rate of tax applicable on the goods/services supplied by them. One such industry is the restaurant industry where food is served to consumers either on the table or packed for takeaway. There had been multiple rates and issues relating to non-passing of tax benefits to consumers was widely witnessed. GST ranges from 5% to 18% in this industry, but unfortunately most of the restaurants are intermingling the rate of tax applicable on wide range of food items being sold by them. There had been misconception between food and snacks supplied by the eateries. Most of them believe that snacks like tikki, samosa etc are the one pre-packaged items which are chargeable at 12%. Instead these over the counter dishes are prepared and served as per the order of the customer. There is an elemen...
1 comment
Read more