Skip to main content

Recovery from Employee, Now subject to GST


Recovery from Employee – Now subject to GST



In yet another ruling by AAR in case of M/s Caltech Polymers Private Limited, the scope of term “Supply” has been further widened. Even the companies running canteen as per statutory norms would also be required to pay GST on the amount recovered from the employees. The Ruling held that exemption in respect of canteen run as per Factories Act was available under Service Tax and not under GST. The authority emphasized that supply of food to the employees is covered under Schedule II of the CGST Act 2017, despite the fact that such service is provided with no profit. This means that reimbursement on actual basis will also considered as supply.

The authority held that where the supply is made for a consideration it shall be chargeable to GST. It deliberated on the definitions of term “Supply” and “Consideration” and came to the conclusion that the recovery of food charges from the employees tantamount to consideration for the services rendered by the company. Where the company does not charge any amount it would have gone out of the ambit of Section 7(1)(a).

This Advance ruling has not just expanded the meaning of “supply” for purposes of food but also for any supply of goods/services provided by the company to its employees. For instance, the company provides laptop to its employees and deducts monthly installment from salary, it shall also be charged to GST. Or the other case would be where the company bears the petrol expenses of the car used by the employee/owned by the employee and then recovers the same, it shall attract GST. To be simply put, a company recovering any amount from its employees other than advances/loans etc. will tantamount to supply chargeable to GST.

We feel rather than providing goods or services to the employees and then recovering the said amount, the company can resort to loan and advances. Where an advance is given to an employee and recovered on monthly basis, it shall not be treated as “supply” and the company would not be required to pay GST. Instead of providing laptop the company can resort to advances for purchase of laptop.

With the interpretation taken by AAR, not only the term “supply” is expanded but also the term “Aggregate turnover” would also have an impact. The reimbursements if covered under term Supply would also form part of the Aggregate turnover. For instance a consultant making tax payment on behalf of the client and then getting it reimbursed would also be liable to pay GST on said amount.  

We at MyGst.MyTax understand that it is very important for taxpayers to do rigorous deliberation and check what amongst their transactions is chargeable to GST or not. Because if these sort of judgments keep on coming, we feel that most of the transaction would form part of Supply leaving apart a few.      


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Renting of Warehouse for Agriculture Produce – Taxable under GST

In the case of Rishi Shipping – Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling has cleared the air that Storing/warehousing and renting of immovable property are two different type of services. Merely because the agricultural produce is stored in an immovable property it would not classify it as Storage and Warehousing Services. Therefore the same shall not be covered under S. No. 54 of Negative List (Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017), hence taxable under the purview of CGST and IGST Act. The Authority held that in order to classify a service as Storage and Warehousing, it should be coupled with loading/unloading/packing services etc. The authority was of the view that where mere building is let out, it shall be classified as renting of immovable property which is chargeable to tax. It is the composite supply, principal supply being renting of immovable property for storage of agricultural produce which is exempt from tax. It further held that once the...

GST Registration in case of Renting of Immovable properties:

GST Registration in case of Renting of Immovable properties: By CA. Keshav R Garg 1.      Let us first understand that the place of registration is decided by the term place of business as defined by section 2(85) of the CGST Act 2017. As per the definition of “Place of Business” it is a place from where the business is carried on and/or where a warehouse or any other place for storage of goods is located and/or books of accounts are maintained and/or the business through agent is carried on. It nowhere considers “place of supply” for determining the Place of business for the purpose of GST Registration. Hence, place of supply has no impact as far as GST Registration is concerned. 2.      As per section 22 of the CGST Act 2017, a person is liable to take registration from the place he makes a taxable supply. There is a distinction in place of supply and place from one makes taxable supplies. Place of supply is derived to conclud...

Tri-city Restaurants leaving Hole in your pocket by charging higher GST

Tri-city Restaurants leaving Hole in your pocket by charging higher GST By: Keshav R Garg Since the day GST has been enforced in India, most of the business had remained in dilemma about the rate of tax applicable on the goods/services supplied by them. One such industry is the restaurant industry where food is served to consumers either on the table or packed for takeaway. There had been multiple rates and issues relating to non-passing of tax benefits to consumers was widely witnessed. GST ranges from 5% to 18% in this industry, but unfortunately most of the restaurants are intermingling the rate of tax applicable on wide range of food items being sold by them. There had been misconception between food and snacks supplied by the eateries. Most of them believe that snacks like tikki, samosa etc are the one pre-packaged items which are chargeable at 12%. Instead these over the counter dishes are prepared and served as per the order of the customer. There is an elemen...